![]() There were two relevant provisions of the federal law against sports gambling. But there is no rule for how to count votes in a situation like the one created by Breyer’s hybrid vote. ![]() ![]() The Supreme Court has suggested an approach for counting votes when there is no clear majority in a single opinion. Justice Alito delivers opinion in Murphy v. So was the case decided by a 6-3 vote or a 7-2 vote? That would make the vote count 6-2.īut the remaining justice, Stephen Breyer, joined most of Alito’s majority opinion but also part of Ginsburg’s dissent. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Alito’s opinion was joined unambiguously and in full by five others: Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan and Neil Gorsuch. In a decision written by Justice Samuel Alito, the Supreme Court invalidated a federal law, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, which prohibited states from allowing sports gambling at casinos, racetracks and other facilities within a state. National Collegiate Athletic Association. One example came earlier this week in the sports-betting ruling, Murphy v. Here’s a quick quiz: When does 6 plus 1 not necessarily add up to 7?Ĭounting vote totals can sometimes be a challenge at the Supreme Court, especially when the justices write separate opinions that take different forms and reach different conclusions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |